TRWD does business in a "walking quorum" 2 of 3 Justice's say it's okay...
Only in Texas.
The 2nd Court of Appeals voted 2-1 in favor of the Tarrant Regional Water District last week.
You can read the case here - and the FWST take on it here.
You can read tons about the Justice's online...
Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot disagreed in a dissenting opinion and said that the board’s two-person committee’s should be subject to the Open Meetings Act if they are effectively being used to conduct the board’s business.
“By allowing TRWD to have meaningful decisions take place in the committee meetings instead of in open board meetings, the majority approves of TRWD’s using what is in essence a walking quorum,” Dauphinot said. “In my opinion, Bennett raised a fact issue about whether TRWD conducts its business in violation of the water code and TOMA. I therefore dissent.”
The 2nd Court of Appeals voted 2-1 in favor of the Tarrant Regional Water District last week.
You can read the case here - and the FWST take on it here.
You can read tons about the Justice's online...
Justice Lee Ann Dauphinot disagreed in a dissenting opinion and said that the board’s two-person committee’s should be subject to the Open Meetings Act if they are effectively being used to conduct the board’s business.
“By allowing TRWD to have meaningful decisions take place in the committee meetings instead of in open board meetings, the majority approves of TRWD’s using what is in essence a walking quorum,” Dauphinot said. “In my opinion, Bennett raised a fact issue about whether TRWD conducts its business in violation of the water code and TOMA. I therefore dissent.”
0 nhận xét:
Đăng nhận xét